If it was going to take days .. I'd totally agree. There's a lot of messing in that article, but some on Samba do like to do that.... perhaps I'm just a rougharse. But for the time it took to make a receiving notch, about 20 seconds, and the cost of a set of cam bearings for the extra half a shell I though what the hell.. The rest of the fettling was pretry much standard cam fitting for me, but.. might have been lucky.. or perhaps it'll all go pear shaped when I throw it down the motorway Was more worried when I found pump gears could 'drift' accross and hit the cam Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
VW didn't increase the lift and uprate the springs either... (or fit 123 ignition units ) and they liked the idea on later ones (Waterboxer anyway) Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
You probably don’t need them, but it’s probably better to have them. And a lot of folks want them without knowing why.
Interesting to know where the axial thrust comes from on the cam. Radial load I can understand (pushrods, valve springs etc), but the only axial thing I can think of is the thrust of the helical drive gears.
Oh, scoldy . Missed that bit. ‘Tis only the gear thrust that would load the cam back and forth, which is presumably why VW were happy with just a half shell thrust bearing?
Cam wear patterns suggest there would be some axial pushing those tappets round to get that arch shape Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
But not at the same time so it gets pushed in two directions back and forward? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
But there’s four lobes each pushing backwards and forwards at different times and opposite to each other. I’m guessing, but I doubt if there is a significant thrust load from the followers – the load is from the helical cut gear.