i'm not about to start a slating of him mate don't panic, it's more to discuss how the gutter press get away with the word ALLEGED all the time, if you read between the lines like many people do be it on line or in print i'm amazed daily how many people have their lifes ruined by the "reporters"
i was attempting humour as said, the written word can do so much damage true or not. it's scary how many people will read what's on front page and believe it's true no smoke without fire type of situation.
I thought it was Pete Burns out of Dead or Alive, looks like he's been spun round like a record one too many times..
As HF says, innocent til proven otherwise. I don't some some of our rags give a flying about any of that though so long as they can get a PAEDO (alleged or proven) story on the front pages. Anyone is fair game to them, but they do seem to wet their pants with delight if a celeb is involved. There is a good case for banning media revealing who is accused. Difficult I know cos you can't police the world's media. Mathew Kelly had similar accusations, but was exhonerated and has managed to carry on with his carreer, but others find that "no smoke without fire" stuff hard to shake off and it can ruin them even though they've been found not guilty.
